
Why stochastic history must move with the robot
Independent noise restarts can change the sampled behavior even when consecutive replans describe the same physical continuation.

Abstract
Continuous asynchronous replanning is essential for real-time generative robot policies, but independent stochastic initialization can cause mode switching and inconsistent continuation across action chunks. Execution-Aligned Progressive Noise (EAPN) introduces structured stochasticity at both inter-chunk and intra-chunk levels. Across replanning steps, EAPN propagates a shared noise trajectory and aligns it with actual execution displacement. Within each action chunk, it models temporal correlation along action time. The aligned stochastic history is combined with committed action context so that subsequent chunks continue from execution-consistent generative states instead of restarting from independent noise.
Continue the latent process, not just the action output
EAPN replaces independent per-call initialization with a jointly trained structured source. A persistent shared AR(1) trajectory carries stochastic state across policy calls and is advanced by the robot's actual execution displacement, while a private AR(1) process models temporal correlation within each action chunk.
At every replan, the previous source noise is shifted into the current action-time window and encoded together with execution displacement, inference delay and a history-validity mask. The flow policy keeps the committed action prefix fixed, generates only the remaining suffix, and resets the history state at episode boundaries.
Inverted latents retain episode identity

Latent correlation follows execution

Consistency across simulation and real robots
EAPN reduces mode switching and remains robust as asynchronous inference delays increase.
Behavioral consistency
| Method | Success ↑ | MSR ↓ | Switch Gap ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| DDPM-ACT | 73.13% | 3.969% | 0.001913 |
| EAPN | 78.96% | 3.167% | 0.001672 |
Average success rate
| Method | D = 5 | D = 10 | D = 15 |
|---|---|---|---|
| VLASH | 71.5% | 70.3% | 68.3% |
| T-RTC | 89.8% | 80.3% | 73.0% |
| EAPN | 88.3% | 83.0% | 75.0% |
Task success rate
| Method | Object Storage | Cloth Folding |
|---|---|---|
| Naive Async | 65.0% | 63.3% |
| RTC | 80.0% | 60.0% |
| T-RTC | 80.0% | 63.3% |
| VLASH | 85.0% | 93.3% |
| EAPN | 90.0% | 96.7% |
Robustness across execution horizons and inference delays

Compare the motion, side by side
D = 20 and K = 25. Each pair uses the same task, episode and seed. Videos play automatically at original speed.
Microwave placement and door closing
Both methods succeed. For this rollout, EAPN also reduces the recorded action second-difference metric by 22.7%.
Book placement into the caddy
Both methods succeed. For this rollout, EAPN also reduces the recorded action second-difference metric by 17.1%.
Object storage and cloth folding
The left recording shows EAPN; the right recording shows the corresponding comparison baseline. All videos retain their original frame rate and duration.
CITATION
BibTeX
@misc{eapn2026,
title = {Execution-Aligned Progressive Noise for Consistent Asynchronous Replanning in Generative Robot Policies},
author = {Di Wu and Ping Liu and Xuhua Chen and He Zheng and Lingfeng Zhang and Tao Zhang},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2610.06090},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.RO},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06090}
}